Matt Weyuker and the other men suing Harley Davidson for the way their bikes were designed are part of a group of plaintiffs from California that has taken a look at how they have been treated by the motorcycle company. They say Harley knows that the motorcycles they make are dangerous but still sells them anyway.
The motorcycle company is appealing the lawsuit as an abuse of process. The group is represented by attorney Larry Bumpass, who has represented many plaintiffs in similar situations. Harley’s lawyer says the lawsuit and appeal are just a ploy to increase their clientele and profit from selling motorcycles.
In this case, the motorcycle manufacturer has asked for a dismissal of the case. If they win, they will be able to sell more bikes in the future. But if they lose, they will lose all profits made from their sale of the offending bikes. And if they lose too much, they’ll be out of business.
It seems that the motorcycle industry is looking out for its own best interest. Instead of making more bikes and producing a better product, they’re trying to run people out of business who are filing lawsuits against them.
You see, Harley Davidson isn’t really responsible for all the problems with their products. The motorcycle industry is to blame for the quality issues that are common with many of their models. They didn’t do anything wrong when they came up with new designs or improved their materials to make them safer.
If these lawsuits had been filed before they came up with these improvements, they would never have had to worry about the quality issues in the first place. They wouldn’t have had to wait until their products were already so expensive and their customers were getting sick and dying of using them. They’d be able to market their bikes without having to worry about the safety of the products they were selling.
So it makes sense that the company would want to fight the lawsuit, since they’re responsible for the motorcyclist’s negligence. and wrongful death. If this lawsuit is denied, then they’ll still be able to make their bikes and sell them at full price, but they won’t have any profit from the sale of the bikes.
This is why the company wants to defend themselves with a legal team that represents their own interests. But this group is fighting a losing battle with the people who filed the lawsuit, since they are fighting on behalf of the Harley Davidson company and not the motorcyclist or the rider who was killed by the product that caused their injuries.
Every time bike manufacturers take advantage of a situation and try to get compensation from their consumers, they are only benefiting themselves. This strategy is always a good one because it tends to get the other side of the case off their back.
An attorney representing the motorcyclist and the victim should look to the situation from the perspective of the victim. It’s not about the motorcyclist. The motorcyclist didn’t do anything wrong and shouldn’t be responsible for the accident that caused their injury.
The industry’s fault should be where the lawyer stands when it comes to the lawsuit and not the rider’s. The attorney should be working for the victims, since they’re in the lawsuit. It’s the rider’s rights that they are trying to protect here.
In a legal sense, there is no reason that a Biker’s attorney should work for a company or a person who is trying to sue the victim of an accident. They should represent the rider who is responsible for the accident, and that includes the company that brought up this lawsuit to begin with. After all, the company did something wrong when it comes to their design, their materials, or their manufacturing procedures.
